Adam Klein's own daughter calls him a deadbeat

Adam Klein's own daughter calls him a deadbeat
Keaton... ignored by a sperm donor millionaire daddy

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

KingCast Observation: The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Loves my Judge Dorothy Gibson Protects Deadbeat Dads Journal Yippieee!!!

I always know when they are snooping around.
Not that I give a shit.
Read below the fold.
Commonwealth Of Massachusetts (

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

KingCast and SJC 1:19 Advocate Janet Aldrich Review Eric Karp and Joseph Berman's Use of Straw Man Nan Sauer to Obtain Impounded Documents.

Dow Jones, really?

From Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's 
Emergency Motion to Revoke Authentication

I noted in this journal entry that Ms. Aldrich would be sending me the final day of this trial in video, and she has done so. Here we are in Boston as I was on my way to Seattle for a fortnight. As you may recall, this is the fallout from the dirtbag convict cum eMusic CEO Adam Klein's refusal to follow the terms of the agreement he had set up with Daralyn Khan after he tried every trick in the book to deny parentage and lost. More about married man Adam Klein and his recent legal troubles, including the settled sexual harassment eMusic lawsuit by former employee Aimee McCormack here. Defendant and counsel freely admit to using Attorney Nan Sauer to obtain a document that Plaintiff did not agree to put into evidence from the Impounded file at the Middlesex County Probate Courthouse, i.e. the home of corruption. See generally John Buonomo (i.e. the f_____g thief who still gets his pension hahaha joke's on us) and read this journal entry.

In their Memorandum in Response to Plaintiff Khan's emergency motion, they claim that Nan Sauer obtained the gold seal document "as a professional courtesy" because only attorneys of record could obtain the sealed document. And according to the clerk I spoke with, the rules are even tighter once the case is CLOSED..... and this case was indeed CLOSED. So contrary to the implication in Defendant Karp's Memorandum that "current counsel" could have access, the clerk flat told me that only the actual Parties could obtain the documents, not even their counsel. And that's No Word of a Lie, give me a goddamn polygraph and I'll rock it 24/7.

Well the problem with that "professional courtesy " argument is that Nan Sauer never was attorney of record. But she was a law clerk at the Middlesex Courthouse who apparently wielded her influence to obtain a nasty opinion from Judge Borstein about Ms. Khan. As noted in the movie, the journal entry next to her name read "pro se."  Well surely she knew she was not "pro se" because the firm she works for (Lee Levine) was actually opposing counsel to Defendant Karp, who was at the time in question, representing Ms. Khan. And surely the clerk's office knew that Attorney Sauer was not "pro se" because she was a f____g law clerk there, right. Everyone knows who she is. So why didn't the record reflect who she was? 

Because everyone knew that she was there to obtain documents that Attorney Karp had no legal right to obtain, that's why.

Anyway, the Jury then heard how that Judge felt that Ms. Khan spent too much of her time litigating against the jackass "deadbeat" (according to his own daughter) father, Adam Klein. I believe some of this vitriol may have been redacted on the actual exhibit, which was then put into evidence in spite of the fact that no certified copy could be found.

The fact that these documents were admitted into evidence is not surprising to me because according to Ms. Khan, Judge Christine McEvoy, while not drunk, did demonstrate some unlawful bias in this case because she made certain statements that included: 
"I was married for 17 years and I never saw money like this....."
To which Counsel for Plaintiff said "Your Honor, I am not certain of the terms of your divorce but it has nothing to do with this case." 

I dunno. For all I know, maybe that bottle had something to do with it. This book is going to be a hoot. As a video book it must contain a segment from me schooling an unruly Boston area (Suffolk County) Court Clerk. Sometimes these clerks get out of hand...... such as when they allow former law clerks like Nan Sauer to come in and sign out and certify impounded documents without even putting her name on file. I wonder where they get it from, right. I'm certain the ACLU agrees with me even though they won't publicly say it; my work has graced their pages on more than one occasion. 

Monday, June 3, 2013

KingCast Affiliate Reports that Jury Denies Liability in Khan v. Karp Legal Malpractice Case Involving eMusic CEO Felon Adam Klein.

Well folks the Jury declined to find liability after Judge McAvoy allowed in negative commentary from other judges that was in my opinion illegally and unethically-obtained. I have watched the legal system screw this woman over for years and years and years, starting with Judge Dilday who refused to allow evidence that Klein lied about his residency to avoid service, ab initio. She can't get justice while everyone stumbles in their hast to get on their knees before Adam Klein. So nothing new here. Well not everyone gets on their knees. Some folks -- most notably Aimee MacCormac -- successfully sue him for sexual harassment, ahem. Methinks he likes to f__ women over (as well as his business colleagues just ask Boumat, Ltd. vis a vis his felony conviction) and most of the time he gets away with it somehow and comes out like the Teflon Don. My thanks to Janet Aldrich/ for today's video coverage, that I will be hosting soon, as I had another shoot in New Haven.

Saturday, June 1, 2013

KingCast says Boston Lawyers Eric Karp, Joseph Berman and Nan Sauer are Facing Bar Complaint on Impounded Documents in Khan v Karp Adam Klein eMusic Child Support Lawsuit.

Today's global email to all parties and counsel:
Khan v. Klein Day Three Preview: Probategate and a Bar Ethics Complaint. 
Yes, indeed it is. Now I know why Defendant Karp would not answer my question in the hallway. 

Why am I not surprised? I have seen big time well-connected lawyers get away with all matter of illegalities in several states as a lawyer and as a journo. Attorneys Karp and Berman had absolutely no legal right to several documents in question, so they used a strawman and prior law clerk of the Middlesex Probate Court from a law firm on a case other than the one at trial to get them, and she apparently listed herself as pro se to do so. 

[Nan Sauer's] sole purpose at the Middlesex Probate Courthouse on 28 May 2013 (trial day) was to act as agent of Defendant Karp, who had no goddamn right to these documents are we clear? At least that much is unambiguous, right Wherefore, I am reporting all of you to the BBO with a copy of today's movie. 

As to whether the Court allows any of this material in is question for the Court and reviewable on appeal (See generally Prescott v. Register of Probate 395 Mass 274 (1985) but I would hate to think that Her Honor would grant imprimatur to these back alley sleazeball tactics. It is axiomatic in criminal proceedings that illegally-obtained "evidence" should not be used. See Commonwealth v. Picardi, 401 Mass 1008 (1988). I am not certain how things should have proceeded in this civil context, perhaps a Motion should have been filed back in the day, per Commonwealth v. O'Brien 27 Mass App. Ct. 184 (1989), I don't know. 

What I do know is that using a straw man to obtain the documents is shady at best. Having observed the Middlesex courthouse yesterday I know everyone there is talking about and watching this case. And they are not the only ones. I'm back to finishing today's movie production, but first a ride on the Triumph to clear the head from all of this sleaze. Everyone needs a break. But to my review of this case over the past six (6) years, Daralyn Khan never got hers. Apparently John Buonomo sets the tone for how things work around here, nice. Just a bunch of criminals in suits and ties, basically. The same as Adam Klein, and that's a fact. 


[Email #2] And I'm not done with you yet: I will look for the sound clip from what I recall as Defendant Karp on redirect from Attorney Berman, discussing Lee, Levine and he says "They are a formidable foe.... and you can trust them when they say they are putting something forward, they have integrity, blah blah blah." 
In point of fact Karp was probably in bed with these creeps all along. They are not his foe. They are trying to protect him and slice up Ms. Khan.... when did it turn like that.... or was it like that all along, I wonder. I'm pretty sure I still have that wonderful video file. I'll guess you have to stay tuned, as I am sure you will. 
[Snip! Much more with days one and two below the fold].

Thursday, May 30, 2013

KingCast Sees "Deadbeat Dad" eMusic CEO Adam Klein Trial Day Two in Child Support Malpractice Lawsuit: Daralyn Khan v. Eric Karp.

How did the Impounded documents make it to trial and why are they relevant?
Answer: The Documents from the closed, impounded custody case resulting from Adam Klein fighting fatherhood got there by and through Lee Levine's office because I went to the Middlesex Courthouse to meet Ms. Khan and another Court observer as Ms. Khan discovered that Defendant Karp and his attorney Joseph Berman are using documents they obtained through deceit and deception!  

I believe this conduct is unethical and I may file a complaint with the Board of Bar Overseers (BBO) on it. They will probably make it go away but it must be done nonetheless: Nan Sauer is an attorney with whatever permutation of Lee, Levine Bowser's office is called these days. Prior to that she was a law clerk at Middlesex Probate, possibly during the time that Registrar cum felon John Buonomo was busy robbing the place blind. So she knows full well that only the parents should be having access to the closed case files in cases from 1992 that were automatically impounded. More on this later. Now Lee Levine helped Spencer Kagan in his ascension to the bench after Gus Celluci had tapped him for the position but Kagan had a pending lawsuit and ethics issues and he arguably lied about those on his application. Judge Kagan presided over Ms. Khan's case and took the legally enforceable opinion that was adverse to her (and adverse to Defendant Karp) in finding palpable ambiguity in the Agreement drafted by Karp. See Karp Affidavit, infra

Nan Sauer went to the courthouse on 28 May 2012 and apparently illegally obtained copies of two negative orders by putting in an appearance as "pro se." She did then forward these orders for use by Attorney Berman, as he would have had no legal access to these documents. That's pretty sleazy, but then what did you expect, we're dealing with Middlesex Probate Court after all.

Here's the fun part: I predicted this a year ago, in April of 2012 in this Journal Entry. Here's an excerpt:
Now Denner's office has apparently reneged on a promise it made a long time ago to amend the complaint against Karp, and my little birdy tells me that all of these guys -- including Attorney Rivers -- pictured, right -- are discussing her legal malpractice case. Why Rivers? He has no horse in this race, and if anything should be called as her witness against Karp....
So Lee, Levine --- who used to take up residency in this journal -- is so pissed off at Ms. Khan and the exposure this case has generated that they will go to any unethical length they can think of in order to try to stain Daralyn Khan when none of this would have happened if their felonious, sexually-harassing client had honored his Agreement.


Zurich... is large and in charge in front of the Courthouse.
And as Defendant Karp's insurer, they do not value Ms. Khan.  

Today's movie will be up late night, but I'm sure the key players will be waiting and watching. They always are.

Here is Day One.

Here's some food for thought: How did Eric Karp get hold of recent documents in an impounded case? He resigned as her counsel a long time ago. So depending on the timeframe either one of her subsequent counsel like Jeffrey Denner (another snake) gave it to him or he went in to Court and got it himself even though he should have already filed his withdrawal. But if he had filed his withdrawal then he would not have had access to the document. The Court cannot simply say "some of this is relevant" if a document was illegally obtained there could be sanctions issued against the offending attorney right. Right. At least that's the way it is supposed to happen. Note: We now know how the documents were obtained, through sleaze and deception by and through a licensed attorney, i.e. Nan Sauer, supra.

Today is interesting because the Court admonished at the outset that this is not about Adam Klein and his bad actions. I don't have an exact quote but that was the gist of it. The problem is, however, his bad actions and complete neglect of his daughter directly influenced the causes and courses of action that Daralyn Khan had to take in order to protect the interests of their daughter. Furthermore, the Defendant, knowing Klein's propensity for fraud and deceit and slow payments, should have had a raised state of awareness so as to avoid giving Adam Klein any loopholes.... which again is entirely consistent with his own Affidavit as noted in yesterday's movie and journal entry linked, above.

So on my ride home I thought more about today's events vis a vis my knowledge of much of the entire case and the judges involved, i.e. Dilday, Kagan and Gibson, but more on that momentarily. First I shall complete my thoughts on Adam Klein's criminal nature and other arguably nefarious and unfatherly conduct:

First, he is a known, convicted felon for charges that were issued well into his adult, professional life. That should tell a practitioner of reasonable experience on Actual, Heightened Notice right ab initio

Second, as noted in yesterday's courtroom summary Adam Klein fought paternity on three (3) different levels, including a scientific test. Apparently he believed Ms. Khan to be a bit of a slut, when in point of fact he should be looking in the mirror relative to his sexual harassment of one Aimee MacCormac in the eMusic lawsuit that settled five (5) months ago. Be that as it may, it is yet another indicator that Adam Klein should be approached with substantial care.

Third, Adam Klein repeatedly late-paid. See above.

Fourth, Expert Witness Stephen Kuzma made a valid point in noting that the malpractice exists, ipso facto because of Defendant Karp's own Affidavit, which is of course an Admission per FRCP 801(d)(2) and I'm sure by the same stateside code in MA whatever it is. The Affidavit stressed the intent of the parties in that it did not have a finite end to the term unless there was a VALID COURT ORDER pursuant to litigation or negotiation/mediation. But Judge Spencer M. "Boobies" Kagan determined that  there was ambiguity and he resolved the matter adversely to Plaintiff Khan precisely because of the clauses at issue herein. 

But prior to that, guess what? In attempting to mitigate her damages, Ms. Khan had tried to bring a case against Adam Klein way back in the Day, but Judge Dilday ruled the Court did not have jurisdiction and refused to review the Drivers' License and voting records that to me clearly show that Adam Klein lied about his residency, surprise surprise. The documents are here
Next Spencer Kagan had the case for another two years and issued adverse rulings without disclosing that Khan's opposing counsel Lee Levine & Bowser were instrumental in getting him to the Bench because he had pending litigation/disciplinary issues, and that's a fact, Jack. He eventually recused and then Judge Dorothy Gibson got the case and it took another two years for anything to happen, so it's not as if Ms. Khan has sat on her hands here. 

It's not surprising she can't work much more than she has because she's had to fight a legal army --- and the Courts -- for Justice.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

KingCast Sees "Deadbeat Dad" eMusic CEO Adam Klein Trial Commence in Child Support Malpractice Lawsuit: Daralyn Khan v. Eric Karp.


Today's Trial Summary is coming by 7:45p.
On Thursday the 30th I will be watching for impounded docs.
Meanwhile folks are watching KingCast coverage, as usual:

Daralyn Khan breaks down recalling how Adam Klein told her to have an abortion 
after he seduced her and the pair had been dating for several months.
As we see, "Dr. Klein" is adept at seducing, or trying to seduce younger women. 
Sometimes however instead of hanging drawers he is getting sued.
A pensive Eric Karp, Esq.
You know Adam Klein's own disfavored daughter called the guy a "Deadbeat Dad" right? The guy ("Dr. Klein" as some call him) paid according to support Agreement for six (6) years and then stopped paying, citing a clause in the Agreement that is something akin to Slick Willie's "Depends on the definition of is." Now the mother, Daralyn Khan, is suing her lawyer for leaving open such loopholes and for not making assurances that Adam Klein would not pay less than the support guidelines. This case has more twists and turns than Mulholland Drive, but for now simply check my Notice of Media Coverage. Excerpt:
I have been following this case for more than five (5) years now as it involves the fullest extant of a situation in which the CEO of a multinational corporation and journalism professor at Columbia University has a substantial criminal background as an International felon out of South Africa, and has recently settled a sexual harassment lawsuit at his current place of employment, eMusic. The fact that he exerts substantial power of influence over hundreds of thousands of people, if not millions, is a matter of public interest given his public transgressions. My research further indicates that he lied about his residency in order to avoid service in the underlying case. I'll post that link today.

Interestingly, the Court held yesterday that this is not a guidelines case. But that begs the question: Can private parties ever negotiate a contractual obligation that results in payment of less than what the State guarantees as the minimal requirements for the health and welfare of the child? The answer I am told, is yes... but only with prior court approval. And why on Earth would a millionaire entertain such a notion in the first place?

I don't know, maybe perhaps he's the type of guy would would be (and is) a felon. Maybe perhaps because he is the kind of guy who, at 60, and more importantly while married, tried to smash up on eMusic underling Aimee McCoormack and ended up settling a sexual harassment lawsuit just several months ago!

From Dylan Love's Business Insider story 24 Jan, 2012.
The Courts, especially by and through one Spencer M. Kagan, have coddled this man and punished the mother empirically. My position as a former trial attorney is to say that the American and World Public has a right to know how the Court systems works when the rich and powerful are involved and that is precisely why I am here. eMusic follows my journal page, Chris King’s First Amendment Page and watches my videos: